Television as a Symbolic Culture: A Study of Media Ethnography in Bogor
Keywords:television, culture, symbolic, ethnography, village
Television has become a part of everyday life for people in the world. Television is an electronic mass media that is greatly enjoyed by the public. This media has become part of everyday life for the community, besides that television also has a great influence on attitudes and behavior for its audience, which has positive and negative effects. The program presented by television is a program that can provide quick information for the audience. This journal aims to analyze the meaning of television construction given by the people of Ciluar Village, Bogor. The role of television as a source of information and a means of entertainment has developed into a cultural symbol in a society. Television shifted to become a cultural symbol between a society. This study uses a qualitative approach with ethnographic media. The data collection technique used is observation with three informants involved in this interview, because they meet the criteria (requirements). This study uses selective coding to
classify several findings that can describe how the people of Ciluar Village apply television as their symbolic culture. Based on the results of the interview, there are three selective coding, namely interest, watching habit, and television as a symbolic culture. The results show that television has a high influence on measuring the level of equality, especially class and social status, as well as being a source of information and can be a means of entertainment. The people of Ciluar Village, Bogor interpret television according to their socio-cultural context. For those in Ciluar Village, television can be a source of information and as a means of entertainment.
A, Putra. 1993. “Televisi Sebagai Media Massa Elektronik.” http://eprints.umm.ac.id/35128/3/jiptummpp-gdl-adeatmaaul-47342-3-babii.pdf.
Andung, Petrus Ana, Dian Wardiana Sjuchro, Aloysius Liliweri, and Purwanti Hadisiwi. 2018. “Television as a Symbolic Culture: A Media Ethnography Study of the Border Communities of Indonesia - Timor Leste.” Teorija in Praksa 55(2): 328–44.
Aryani, Yuniar Christy. 2017. “BUDAYA KEMISKINAN DI KOTA SURAKARTA.” 32(2): 64–79.
Astuti, Santi Indra. 2003. “‘Cultural Studies’ Dalam Studi Komunikasi: Suatu Pengantar.” Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi 4(1): 55–68. https://ejournal.unisba.ac.id/index.php/mediator/article/view/825.
Hadi, Ido Prijana. 2007. “Sebuah Perspektif Teoritik Dalam Analisis Televisi.” Jurnal Ilmiah SCRIPTURA 1(1978-385X): 1–13.
Ibrahim, Idi Subandy. 2011. “Budaya Komunikasi.” budaya komunikasi 1(9786028252645). http://library.fis.uny.ac.id/opac/index.php?p=show_detail&id=7123.
Juliana. 2014. “AKTIVITAS COSPLAY SEBAGAI REKREASI PARA COSPLAYER DI JAKARTA.” Binus University. http://library.binus.ac.id/eColls/eThesisdoc/Bab2/2013-1-00459-JP Bab2002.pdf.
Lathifah, Aliyah. 2016. “Media, Jurnalisme Dan Budaya Populer.”
Mahalli, Zainal. 2016. “Studi Dampak Tayangan Televisi Terhadap Perkembangan Perilaku Sosial Anak.”
Melodika, Hanifah. 2007. “Televisi Dan Budaya Populer (Studi Korelasional Pengaruh Terpaan Tayangan Drama Asia (Korea) Di Indosiar Terhadap Perilaku Budaya Populer Di Kalangan Siswa.” https://www.academia.edu/1381014/Televisi_Dan_Budaya_Populer_Studi_Korelasional_Pengaruh_Terpaan_Tayangan_Drama_Asia_Korea_di_Indosiar_terhadap_Perilaku_Budaya_Populer_di_Kalangan_Siswa_.
Mufid, Muhamad. 2007. “Komunikasi Dan Regulasi Penyiaran.” In Indonesia: Jakarta Kencana Prenada Media Group , 2007. http://kin.perpusnas.go.id/DisplayData.aspx?pId=9013&pRegionCode=UNES&pClientId=634.
Rozak, Abdul. 2016. “Perilaku Masyarakat Desa Terpencil Menonton Tayangan Televisi.” Jurnal Aplikasi Ilmu-ilmu Agama 16: 101–12. ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/pusat/aplikasia%0APerilaku.
Saefudin, H A, and Antar Venus. 2005. “‘ Cultivation Theory .’” (56): 83–90.
Sangaji, Bintang. 2004. “Pengantar Teori Komunikasi Littlejohn.” https://www.academia.edu/11154907/pengantar_teori_komunikasi_littlejohn.
Susena, Edy. 2015. “Pengaruh Sinetron Televisi Terhadap Pola Hidup Masyarakat Pedesaan Di Kabupaten Boyolali.” Jurnal Sainstech Politeknik Indonusa Surakarta 1(2355–5009): 1–8.
Teh, Sidhi Wiguna. 2007. Feng Shui & Arsitektur “Feng Shui & Arsitektur.” PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Tobing, Darma. 2012. 72 Child development “Kekerabatan Terhadap Penggunaan Kontrasepsi IUD.” repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/47147/4/Chapter II.pdf.
Triwardani, Reny. “Televisi Dalam Ruang Keluarga : Menyoal Menonton Televisi Sebagai Praktik Konsumsi Dalam Konfigurasi Ruang Domestik.” 8(1994).
Wati, Ayu Azhari Liana. 2018. 1 Pendidikan Guru “Pengaruh Tayangan Televisi Terhadap Interaksi Sosial Dan Agresifitas Anak.”
Y, Gayuh. 2004. “Gabungan Antara Informasi Dan Entertainment.”
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Dinda Silvia Izdihar Fairuz, Khairunnisa Meydina, Syahya Rembulan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright rules apply for the articles that are featured in COMMENTATE: Journal of Communication Management
- COMMENTATE: Journal of Communication Management holds the right to be the first to publish the article.
- Authors will still be the copyright holder for their articles published on COMMENTATE: Journal of Communication Management and can use it freely as long as it does not violate the rules.
- Papers featured on COMMENTATE: Journal of Communication Management are under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Further details can be access on Open Access Policy.