Nuclear Weapon Discussion on G20 Forum

A Media Framing Analysis From,, and Assyarqu Al-Awsathu Online Media


  • Maulana Ashari Unida Gontor
  • Rohmah Akhirul Mukharom Universitas Darussalam Gontor
  • Aditya Fahmi Nurwahid Universitas Darussalam Gontor



G20; Nuclear Weapon; Online Media; Framing Analysis


Indonesia holds a key role as host of the G20 Presidency in 2022. Many international media highlighted this summit and the issues that has been discussed inside.As a world economic forum, G20 Presidency in Indonesia also reviewed about the international security issue, one of it is nuclear weapon threat. This study identifies, analyze, and compares the content produced by Indonesia (, United Kingdom (, and Saudi Arabia’s online news media (, surrounding the frame of nuclear weapons issue on G20 Forum. The study utilizes the framing analysis model of Zhondang Pan and Gerald M. Kosicki, to explain the message that communicated by the three countries related on nuclear weapon issue on G20 summit. The major findings clearly captured that every media adopted different rhetorical frames through the media coverage of the G20 Presidency in Indonesia. Related on nuclear weapon issue, Indonesian media imply a neutral approach, different with UK’s media that used straightforward approach or Saudi’s media with interior approach.


Astuti, W. R. D., & Fathun, L. M. (2020). Indonesian Economic Diplomacy in the G20 Economic Regime during the Administration of Joko Widodo. Intermestic: Journal Of International Studies, 5(1), 47–68.

Atkinson, C. (2020). G20 leaders must answer to COVID-19. In Science (Vol. 368, Issue 6487, p. 111). American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Callaghan, M. (2013). Relaunching the G20. Lowy Institute for International Policy Sydney.

Doufesh, B., & Briel, H. (2021). Ethnocentrism in Conflict News Coverage: A Multimodal Framing Analysis of the 2018 Gaza Protests in The Times of Israel and Al Jazeera. International Journal of Communication.

Hashmat, S., & Rawan, B. (2020). Comparative Frame Analysis of ‘War on Terror’: Content Analysis of USA and Pakistan’s Press. Sjesr, 3(3), 238–245.

Jagtiani, S., Hoffmann, C., Prys-Hansen, M., & Bilgic, A. (2022). G20: The Global South’s New Status-Seeking Platform?

Lichtenstein, D., & Koerth, K. (2022). Different shows, different stories: How German TV formats challenged the government’s framing of the Ukraine crisis. Media, War & Conflict, 15(2), 125–145.

Löw, F., & Dewenter, R. (2022). Biased reporting by the German media? Diskussionspapier.

Mukherjee, B. (2022). India and the G20 Presidency: Its Priorities and Challenges. India Foundation.

Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55–75.

Ping, Y. (2022). Representations of the 2014 Hong Kong protests in journalistic translation: A corpus-based critical framing analysis of Chinese and English news coverage. Journalism, 14648849221074556.

Saputra, F., & Ali, H. (2021). The Impact of Indonesia’s Economic and Political Policy Regarding Participation in Various International Forums: G20 Forum (Literature Review of Financial Management). Journal of Accounting and Finance Management, 2(1), 40–51.

Simatupang, H. Y., & Panggabean, M. R. (2022). The Implementation of Indonesia’s Free and Active Foreign Policy Over the Russia-Ukraine War During Indonesia’s G20 Presidency. International Conference on Sustainable Innovation on Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences (ICOSI-HESS 2022), 590–602.

Teresia, Ananda., & Sulaiman, Stefanno. (2022, November 13). Indonesia expects G20 to deliver concrete outcomes for global economic recovery. Reuters.

Wint, K. P. (2022). STUDY ON INDIA’S APPROACH TO PLAY A CRITICAL ROLE IN G20 AND GLOBAL GOVERNANCE. International Journal of Creative and Innovative Research in All Studies, 5(3), 20–25.




How to Cite

Ashari, M., Rohmah Akhirul Mukharom, & Aditya Fahmi Nurwahid. (2023). Nuclear Weapon Discussion on G20 Forum: A Media Framing Analysis From,, and Assyarqu Al-Awsathu Online Media. Communicare : Journal of Communication Studies, 10(1), 56–65.