Machiavellian Leadership Communication in Korean Manhwa

Authors

  • Muhammad Taufiq LSPR Institute of Communication & Business

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37535/

Keywords:

Machiavellian Leadership Communication

Abstract

This study examines the representation of Machiavellian leadership communication in the Korean manhwa Heavenly Demon Can’t Live a Normal Life. Departing from conventional studies that locate Machiavellianism within formal political institutions or historical leadership, this research positions popular visual narratives as significant sites for the construction and dissemination of power discourse. Using a qualitative approach and critical discourse analysis, the study analyses narrative structures, character dialogues, and visual symbolism to uncover how leadership, legitimacy, and organizational control are communicatively produced. The findings reveal that leadership in the manhwa is constructed as a strategic communicative practice rather than mere coercion or inherited authority. The protagonist, Roman Dmitri, establishes legitimacy through a combination of performative competence, centralized decision-making, symbolic violence, and strategic displays of care. These communicative practices generate voluntary consent and organizational loyalty, aligning closely with Machiavellian principles that emphasize effectiveness, stability, and the management of perception. Furthermore, the manhwa integrates political communication and organizational communication by depicting power as a continuous process of discourse reproduction within a hierarchical structure. Authority is normalized through narratives that frame domination as necessary, rational, and morally justified when accompanied by protection and responsibility. This study contributes to communication scholarship by demonstrating that Korean manhwa functions as a meaningful political-organizational text, capable of articulating complex Machiavellian leadership logics through visual storytelling.

References

Cohn, N. (2013). The visual language of comics: Introduction to the structure and cognition of sequential images. Bloomsbury.

Corner, J., & Pels, D. (Eds.). (2003). Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity and cynicism. SAGE Publications.

Eisenberg, E. M., Goodall, H. L., Jr., & Trethewey, A. (2017). Organizational communication: Balancing creativity and constraint (7th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin’s.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds. & Trans.). International Publishers.

Gray, J., Sandvoss, C., & Harrington, C. L. (Eds.). (2017). Fandom: Identities and communities in a mediated world (2nd ed.). New York University Press.

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.

Kim, S. Y., & Park, J. H. (2023). Leadership, power, and legitimacy in Korean digital narratives. Asian Journal of Communication, 33(4), 412–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2023.2187421

Lasswell, H. D. (1948). Power and personality. W. W. Norton & Company.

Lee, H. K. (2022). Korean popular culture and the politics of storytelling in digital comics. Journal of Asian Cultural Studies, 14(2), 85–102.

Machiavelli, N. (1998). The Prince (H. C. Mansfield, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1532)

McCloud, S. (1994). Understanding comics: The invisible art. HarperCollins.

Mumby, D. K. (2019). Organizational communication: A critical approach. SAGE Publications.

Putnam, L. L., & Mumby, D. K. (2014). The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods. SAGE Publications.

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-20

How to Cite

Machiavellian Leadership Communication in Korean Manhwa. (2025). Communicare : Journal of Communication Studies, 12(1), 115-124. https://doi.org/10.37535/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 48

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.