Peer Review Process

Journal of ASEAN Research is subject to COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. For details, please access the Publication Ethics section.

Every article that is submitted to the Journal of ASEAN Research will go through a series of review processes. The process used is double-blind peer review. This process ensures that neither the author nor the reviewer knows the other's identity. We do this to maintain objectivity in the ongoing review process.

·       The review process is carried out after the article goes through the initial editing process.

·       In the review process, reviewers are encouraged to pay attention to originality, objectivity, methodology, scientific impact, conclusions, and references in the article.

·       This underlies the editor to carry out the next process, accepting the article, revision, or rejection of the article.

 

Article manuscripts will be rejected if

·       It is not matched with the journal scope.

·       It does not follow author guidelines and is not willing to make adjustments.

·       More than 20% of plagiarism is indicated.

·       It contains topics or discussions that promote cigarettes or cigarette companies.