Peer Review Process

EnVation: Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. For further information, please refer to the Publication Ethics section.

Every manuscript submitted to EnVation will undergo a series of review and editorial processes. The journal applies a double-blind peer review system in which both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review process to ensure objectivity and fairness.

The review process is conducted after the manuscript passes the initial editorial screening. At this stage, the editorial team evaluates the suitability of the manuscript with the journal’s focus and scope, writing guidelines, and publication standards.

During the peer review process, reviewers are encouraged to evaluate the originality, relevance, methodology, implementation process, academic contribution, project outcomes, discussion, conclusions, and references used in the manuscript. As a project-based and implementation-oriented research journal, EnVation particularly values manuscripts that demonstrate systematic entrepreneurial project implementation, innovation processes, and measurable impacts.

Based on the reviewers’ recommendations and editorial considerations, the editor may decide to accept the manuscript, request revisions, or reject the submission.

Article manuscripts will be rejected if:

●     It does not match the focus and scope of the journal.

●     It does not follow the author guidelines and the author is unwilling to make adjustments.

●     More than 20% plagiarism is indicated.

●     It contains topics or discussions that promote cigarettes or cigarette companies.